IBM 也推公共 DNS 9.9.9.9

9.9.9.9

DNS

IBM

公共

72 条回复 • 2018-02-01 11:54:58 +08:00

1

dyy1997

2017-11-20 10:52:30 +08:00

<blockquote class="imgur-embed-pub" lang="en" data-id="a/Yn45M"><a href="//imgur.com/Yn45M"></a></blockquote><script async src="//s.imgur.com/min/embed.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
长城阵亡

2

dyy1997

2017-11-20 10:53:49 +08:00

<a href="https://imgur.com/LJwyFGm"><img src="

" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>

3

hugsky

2017-11-20 10:55:17 +08:00

/t/407341
/t/407318

4

Troevil

2017-11-20 10:55:53 +08:00

9.9.9.9
9.9.9.10

5

killadm

2017-11-20 10:59:17 +08:00

9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 271ms，最长 = 272ms，平均 = 271ms

延迟很高

6

kttde

2017-11-20 10:59:32 +08:00

如果支持非 53 端口就还不错

7

janus77

2017-11-20 11:00:21 +08:00

正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=163ms TTL=49
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=160ms TTL=49
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=162ms TTL=49
请求超时。

9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 3，丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 160ms，最长 = 163ms，平均 = 161ms

8

FONG2

2017-11-20 11:22:57 +08:00

正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=221ms TTL=52
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=220ms TTL=52
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=220ms TTL=52
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=219ms TTL=52

9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 219ms，最长 = 221ms，平均 = 220ms

9

fruitscandy

2017-11-20 11:25:22 +08:00

Pinging 9.9.9.9 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=51
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 9.9.9.9:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 66ms, Maximum = 112ms, Average = 77ms

10

CEBBCAT

2017-11-20 11:28:02 +08:00 via Android

好像是有恶意网站过滤，这是不是也算是污染了？

11

sikariba

2017-11-20 11:30:42 +08:00

确实延时很高，我的也 200+ms

12

windirt

2017-11-20 12:09:50 +08:00

PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=247.287 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=224.672 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=221.834 ms

PING 9.9.9.10 (9.9.9.10): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=260.780 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=282.291 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=301.803 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=230.136 ms

13

huanxianghao

2017-11-20 12:12:25 +08:00

延迟很高，深圳电信有 230 左右

14

ashfinal

2017-11-20 12:16:43 +08:00

~ % Ping 9.9.9.9
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=44 time=122.878 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=44 time=122.023 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=44 time=122.914 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=44 time=234.114 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=44 time=126.519 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=44 time=123.828 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=44 time=136.924 ms
^C
--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 122.023/141.314/234.114/38.184 ms

15

zane1994

2017-11-20 12:45:06 +08:00 via iPhone

还没有在中国加节点，所以现在并没有什么用

16

pq

2017-11-20 12:55:34 +08:00

@Troevil 我觉得应该学 Google，主辅的 ip 有一种对称美感：
主：9.9.9.9
辅：9.9.6.6

17

laudukang

2017-11-20 12:56:53 +08:00

正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=277ms TTL=55
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=270ms TTL=55
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=295ms TTL=55
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=304ms TTL=55

9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 270ms，最长 = 304ms，平均 = 286ms

正在 Ping 8.8.8.8 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=28ms TTL=44
来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=25ms TTL=44
请求超时。
来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=34ms TTL=44

8.8.8.8 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 3，丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 25ms，最长 = 34ms，平均 = 29ms

18

matolv

2017-11-20 12:59:11 +08:00

上海联通 ping 正好 100，不丢包，8.8.8.8 是 200，丢包率 50%
@pq 为什么不是 6.9.6.9

19

shingoxray

2017-11-20 12:59:46 +08:00

正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=76ms TTL=51
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=76ms TTL=51
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=76ms TTL=51
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=76ms TTL=51

9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 76ms，最长 = 76ms，平均 = 76ms

正在 Ping 8.8.8.8 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=83ms TTL=50
来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=84ms TTL=50
来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=84ms TTL=50
来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=83ms TTL=50

8.8.8.8 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 83ms，最长 = 84ms，平均 = 83ms

20

roychan

2017-11-20 13:03:14 +08:00

我准备推出一下 0.0.0.0。

21

ihainan

2017-11-20 13:08:26 +08:00

PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=53.8 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=55.5 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=54.6 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=46 time=53.7 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=46 time=53.7 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=46 time=54.5 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=46 time=54.8 ms

22

cooLepus

2017-11-20 13:11:09 +08:00

正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=197ms TTL=53
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=197ms TTL=53
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=197ms TTL=53
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=197ms TTL=53

9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 197ms，最长 = 197ms，平均 = 197ms

正在 Ping 8.8.8.8 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=21ms TTL=44
来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=21ms TTL=44
来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=21ms TTL=44
来自 8.8.8.8 的回复: 字节=32 时间=21ms TTL=44

8.8.8.8 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 21ms，最长 = 21ms，平均 = 21ms

广州电信

23

niceworld

2017-11-20 13:11:40 +08:00

3

@roychan 真正的 0 延迟，无论您在世界的任何一个角落，都能享受到高度可定制化与无延迟的 DNS 服务。 🐶

24

scriptB0y

2017-11-20 13:21:17 +08:00

PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=68.918 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=67.911 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=69.325 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=67.352 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=69.292 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=68.051 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=52 time=68.397 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=52 time=67.392 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=52 time=67.974 ms

25

joy281

2017-11-20 13:27:48 +08:00

> ping 9.9.9.9

Pinging 9.9.9.9 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=54
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=54
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=54
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 9.9.9.9:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 49ms, Maximum = 57ms, Average = 51ms

26

DOLLOR

2017-11-20 13:35:48 +08:00

正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=283ms TTL=50
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=285ms TTL=50
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=289ms TTL=50
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=284ms TTL=50

9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 283ms，最长 = 289ms，平均 = 285ms

这延迟确实惨不忍睹

27

wclebb

2017-11-20 14:03:00 +08:00

211ms

28

raysonx

2017-11-20 14:10:50 +08:00

1

北京联通，ping 不通。
路由追踪结果显示空路由：
Packets Pings
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 192.168.1.1 0.0% 6 6.6 8.9 1.8 22.3 8.4
2. 221.223.*.* 0.0% 6 10.7 15.4 6.8 32.3 9.8
3. 61.148.174.53 0.0% 6 24.3 8.7 4.9 24.3 7.6
4. 61.51.114.189 66.7% 6 7.9 8.3 7.9 8.8 0.0
5. 124.65.194.157 33.3% 6 4.1 22.4 4.1 72.7 33.6
6. 219.158.5.150 0.0% 6 6.8 11.7 6.8 16.4 3.0
7. 219.158.3.178 0.0% 6 8.2 10.4 6.5 15.9 3.5
8. ???

29

chanssl

2017-11-20 14:26:42 +08:00

--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
119 packets transmitted, 101 received, 15% packet loss, time 117996ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 159.031/193.450/277.754/33.227 ms

--- 9.9.9.10 ping statistics ---
114 packets transmitted, 104 received, 8% packet loss, time 113047ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 150.006/200.296/278.582/39.471 ms

30

UnderTakerMS

2017-11-20 14:28:12 +08:00

根据站长之家的测试评论访问时间在 200ms 以上

31

funnypc

2017-11-20 17:56:28 +08:00 via Android

ping 10.10.10.10 延迟 0.014ms

very proud😚 #好吧内网不算
-- from https://t.co/5iNqIDY32g

32

datou

2017-11-20 18:06:53 +08:00

@raysonx 你被特别关注了吧?

33

Northn

2017-11-20 18:14:29 +08:00

34

WAITUNG

2017-11-20 18:24:29 +08:00

190ms

35

flyingghost

2017-11-20 18:29:18 +08:00

魔都电信
--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 67.873/74.915/127.671/14.395 ms
--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
21 packets transmitted, 21 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 63.755/64.835/66.484/0.835 ms

36

v2eros

2017-11-20 18:55:50 +08:00

太高了，250-350 之间

37

Lxxyx

2017-11-20 18:57:21 +08:00

PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=414.808 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=333.716 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=355.080 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=378.428 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=402.134 ms
^C
--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 333.716/376.833/414.808/29.722 ms

38

ghostsf

2017-11-20 18:58:47 +08:00 via Android

延迟有点高

39

Kimyx

2017-11-20 19:27:11 +08:00

9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 73，已接收 = 73，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 202ms，最长 = 209ms，平均 = 204ms

40

jiangzhuo

2017-11-20 19:54:32 +08:00

我准备推出 10.10.10.10

41

hfenger

2017-11-20 20:36:32 +08:00

海外
......
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=42ms TTL=49
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=42ms TTL=49
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=42ms TTL=49
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=42ms TTL=49

9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 10，已接收 = 10，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 42ms，最长 = 42ms，平均 = 42ms

北京
......
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=175ms TTL=49
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=175ms TTL=49
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=204ms TTL=49
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=194ms TTL=49
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=199ms TTL=49

9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 24，已接收 = 24，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 175ms，最长 = 204ms，平均 = 181ms

42

crystone

2017-11-20 20:39:52 +08:00

你们试一下 10.10.10.10

43

powergx

2017-11-20 21:02:20 +08:00

dig google.com @9.9.9.9

; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> google.com @9.9.9.9
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 57060
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;google.com. IN A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.138
google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.102
google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.139
google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.113
google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.100
google.com. 300 IN A 74.125.28.101

;; Query time: 168 msec
;; SERVER: 9.9.9.9#53(9.9.9.9)
;; WHEN: Mon Nov 20 21:01:23 2017
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 124

44

erlinux

2017-11-20 21:20:53 +08:00

上海移动

Pinging 9.9.9.9 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=54
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=54
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=54
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=186ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 9.9.9.9:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 180ms, Maximum = 186ms, Average = 182ms

45

beautifultable

2017-11-20 21:25:32 +08:00

ping 9.9.9.9
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=91.484 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=92.072 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=91.556 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=91.779 ms

--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 91.484/91.723/92.072/0.229 ms

46

testcaoy7

2017-11-20 21:42:05 +08:00 via Android

我这边延迟 63 毫秒

47

jimzhong

2017-11-20 21:55:01 +08:00

PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=21.4 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=13.8 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=16.7 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=19.0 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=21.8 ms

48

dot

2017-11-20 21:59:43 +08:00 via Android

没有 anycast，靓号也没用吧……

49

vimutt

2017-11-20 22:22:04 +08:00

正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=142ms TTL=52
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=142ms TTL=52
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=142ms TTL=52
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=142ms TTL=52

9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 142ms，最长 = 142ms，平均 = 142ms

50

xern

2017-11-20 22:27:42 +08:00 via Android

台湾中华电信
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=107.505 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=106.888 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=107.236 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=107.872 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=106.775 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=107.330 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=49 time=107.017 ms
^C
--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 106.775/107.232/107.872/0.352 ms

51

cloverzrg2

2017-11-20 22:36:14 +08:00

正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
请求超时。
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=333ms TTL=49
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=333ms TTL=49
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=333ms TTL=49

9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 3，丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 333ms，最长 = 333ms，平均 = 333ms

52

fanyuxi

2017-11-20 23:12:47 +08:00

正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=243ms TTL=53
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=265ms TTL=53
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=256ms TTL=53
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=275ms TTL=53

9.9.9.9 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 243ms，最长 = 275ms，平均 = 259ms

53

hallomou

2017-11-20 23:24:43 +08:00

Pinging 9.9.9.9 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=56
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=56
Reply from 9.9.9.9: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 9.9.9.9:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 32ms, Average = 29ms

54

yiduzui

2017-11-20 23:35:02 +08:00

BJLT

root@ysbots:~# ping 9.9.9.9
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=138 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=142 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=136 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=133 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=144 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=225 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=167 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=137 ms
^C
--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 8 received, 11% packet loss, time 8011ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 133.940/153.500/225.722/29.056 ms

55

isCyan

2017-11-20 23:36:16 +08:00

墙外都这么高延迟

56

junbaor

2017-11-20 23:38:57 +08:00

root@wkfg-hk:~# ping 9.9.9.9
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=236 time=444 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=236 time=443 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=236 time=443 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=236 time=443 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=236 time=443 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=236 time=443 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=236 time=443 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=236 time=443 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=236 time=443 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=10 ttl=236 time=443 ms
^C
--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9009ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 443.200/443.517/444.138/0.594 ms

57

isCyan

2017-11-20 23:39:23 +08:00

HPING 9.9.9.9 (en7 9.9.9.9): S set, 40 headers + 0 data bytes
len=46 ip=9.9.9.9 ttl=238 id=8119 sport=53 flags=RA seq=0 win=0 rtt=411.4 ms
len=46 ip=9.9.9.9 ttl=238 id=62439 sport=53 flags=RA seq=2 win=0 rtt=417.7 ms
len=46 ip=9.9.9.9 ttl=238 id=10136 sport=53 flags=RA seq=3 win=0 rtt=411.3 ms
len=46 ip=9.9.9.9 ttl=238 id=33500 sport=53 flags=RA seq=4 win=0 rtt=411.9 ms

--- 9.9.9.9 hping statistic ---
5 packets tramitted, 4 packets received, 20% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 411.3/413.1/417.7 ms

58

wql

2017-11-21 00:02:35 +08:00 via Android

@crystone 这是内网地址啊。阁下实在开玩笑。

59

RqPS6rhmP3Nyn3Tm

2017-11-21 01:30:37 +08:00 via iPad

我准备推出一个 dns 服务，IP 是 127.0.0.1，各位意向如何？

60

Ixizi

2017-11-21 06:50:20 +08:00

正在 Ping 9.9.9.9 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=185ms TTL=55
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=182ms TTL=55
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=200ms TTL=55
来自 9.9.9.9 的回复: 字节=32 时间=182ms TTL=55

61

Ixizi

2017-11-21 06:51:19 +08:00

@BXIA 可以的，我这延迟很低

PS C:\WINDOWS\system32> ping 127.0.0.1

正在 Ping 127.0.0.1 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 127.0.0.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间<1ms TTL=64
来自 127.0.0.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间<1ms TTL=64
来自 127.0.0.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间<1ms TTL=64
来自 127.0.0.1 的回复: 字节=32 时间<1ms TTL=64

62

Maddox

2017-11-21 08:35:30 +08:00

新加坡

~$ ping 9.9.9.9 -c 10
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=2.54 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=2.63 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=2.43 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=2.46 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=2.44 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=2.48 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=2.44 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=2.40 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=2.42 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=2.40 ms

--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9015ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.402/2.467/2.634/0.092 ms

~$ ping 9.9.9.10 -c 10
PING 9.9.9.10 (9.9.9.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=2.23 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=2.18 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=2.10 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=2.13 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=2.20 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=2.13 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=2.17 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=2.08 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=2.18 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=2.15 ms

--- 9.9.9.10 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.081/2.160/2.236/0.044 ms

63

gtanyin

2017-11-21 09:25:22 +08:00

➜ ~ ping 9.9.9.9
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=54 time=257.501 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=277.032 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=232.272 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=213.685 ms
^C
--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 213.685/245.122/277.032/24.109 ms

➜ ~ ping 9.9.9.10
PING 9.9.9.10 (9.9.9.10): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=245.710 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=198.417 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=178.391 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=177.102 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=235.692 ms
^C
--- 9.9.9.10 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 177.102/207.062/245.710/28.663 ms

64

yjxjn

2017-11-21 10:13:57 +08:00

IBM 推的互联网服务，算了，全是垃圾。

65

strongcoder

2017-11-21 10:32:16 +08:00

Last login: Fri Nov 17 16:47:19 on ttys003
➜ ~ ping 9.9.9.9
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=327.342 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=347.923 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=248.081 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=306.733 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=330.761 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=247.672 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=247.926 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=249.439 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=249.715 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 10
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=11 ttl=50 time=250.040 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 12
Request timeout for icmp_seq 13
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=14 ttl=50 time=313.979 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=15 ttl=50 time=245.275 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=16 ttl=50 time=253.463 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=17 ttl=50 time=273.494 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 18
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=19 ttl=50 time=246.300 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=20 ttl=50 time=336.858 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=21 ttl=50 time=253.505 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=22 ttl=50 time=275.436 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=23 ttl=50 time=243.658 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=24 ttl=50 time=318.290 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=25 ttl=50 time=339.844 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=26 ttl=50 time=257.309 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=27 ttl=50 time=279.605 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=28 ttl=50 time=244.957 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 29
Request timeout for icmp_seq 30
Request timeout for icmp_seq 31
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=32 ttl=50 time=280.713 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=33 ttl=50 time=304.152 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=34 ttl=50 time=324.500 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=35 ttl=50 time=243.701 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=36 ttl=50 time=243.540 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=37 ttl=50 time=242.556 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=38 ttl=50 time=242.814 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=39 ttl=50 time=324.518 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 40
^C
--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
42 packets transmitted, 32 packets received, 23.8% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 242.556/277.941/347.923/36.288 ms
➜ ~

66

nVic

2017-11-21 15:43:19 +08:00

0.0.0.0 这个 IP 多少钱？

67

maojy1989

2017-11-22 09:58:01 +08:00

然而这个 DNS 对国内来说没什么卵用，防不了污染、CDN 也不友好

68

imbahom

2017-11-22 10:55:05 +08:00 via iPhone

6 翻了

69

citydog

2017-12-10 19:16:32 +08:00 via iPhone

伦敦的？我说这么慢

70

ponyxx

2018-01-19 23:11:31 +08:00 via Android

PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=22.9 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=36.1 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=27.1 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=9.86 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=25.7 ms
^C
--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4250ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.863/24.369/36.116/8.484 ms

————————————

上海阿里云实测

71

ponyxx

2018-01-19 23:21:32 +08:00 via Android

@ponyxx
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=22.9 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=36.1 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=27.1 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=9.86 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=25.7 ms
^C
--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4250ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.863/24.369/36.116/8.484 ms

————————————

上海阿里云实测

——————————————
抱歉，发错了，上边这是美国 cn2 实测，以下才是上海阿里云实测

https://i.loli.net/2018/01/19/5a620ce7c82aa.png

72

aliipay

2018-02-01 11:54:58 +08:00

坡县 aws
ping 9.9.9.9 -c 5
PING 9.9.9.9 (9.9.9.9) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=2.02 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=1.97 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=1.91 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=1.95 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=1.97 ms

--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.911/1.968/2.026/0.054 ms